Despite Social Media, B2B Email Marketing is Not Dead
B2B email marketing seems to be a hot topic these days judging by the number of articles and reports I’ve been reading.
In its cover story for November 2009, E-Mail Marketing’s Future . . . Right Now, Website Magazine editor-in-chief Peter Prestipino and Senior Editor Mike Phillips report that:

“According to a June 2009 Marketing Trends Survey by StrongMail Systems, 42% of nearly 1,000 global business leaders polled plan to increase their marketing budgets in 2009. Of those, 81% intend to increase their e-mail marketing spend.
“Spending on email marketing . . . shows no signs of slowing down, even as social networks and search engines continue to dominate the marketing headlines.”
Exact Target, in its new white paper, Is Email Marketing Endangered?, reports that according to Forrester Research, investments in email marketing will grow from $1.2 billion in 2009 to $2 billion billion by 2014.
In the same report, Exact Target also notes that the DMA reports that email marketing’s return on investment is greater than $43 for every dollar spent.
Wow! That’s some ROI!
Reasons why email usage is growing
You would think that due to social media, texting, and email inbox overload, people would use email less. I certainly find it easier to connect with people quickly through Twitter, for example. And my son, who has multiple email accounts and a phone, texts me versus calling or emailing me.
I also find texting much easier now that I have an iPhone.
However, it is precisely due to smart phones and social media that email use is up.
Exact Target reports that those who own a smart phone “are significantly more likely to increase email usage than those who don’t,” with 43% of BlackBerry owners using email more often and 41% of iPhone users increasing their email usage.
This is mostly likely because it’s so dang easy to get email on your smart phone versus having to log into a computer.
And all types of organizations and businesses are using email more. Based on my own personal experience, I now get email from my bank, my temple, my gym, and my son’s school. Plus, I get all my regular business email.
On top of that, improved email technology is adding to email’s increased use. Exact Target reports that due to Gmail’s rapid innovations, Gmail users are increasing their use of email by a ratio of 6:1 — versus 2:1 for Yahoo, which has innovated at a much slower rate.
Thanks to Gmail’s integration of its Task application, for example, I can now create a task based on something I receive via email — and connect that email to the task. This means I can clean out my email box faster and not have a bunch of “pending” emails hanging around.
Even better, I added Google’s Task app to my iPhone, making it super easy to keep track of things at literally the press of a button. (No more paper sticky notes!)
Relevant messages still king
Although email appears in our inboxes and we read it, email is not a passive medium — or at least it shouldn’t be.
To be effective, email must engage readers . . . and to this end, it’s really important that email marketers think long and hard about their opt-in policies, campaign frequency, and content.
I realized this truth last week when I spent over three hours cleaning out my Gmail inbox — and unsubscribing from tons of email marketing messages that I’m not sure I ever asked to receive and that I had been simply deleting without reading for months.
Email marketing is so *not* about developing massive email lists (to which many of the people on the list didn’t exactly opt-in) and then sending out *stuff* and hoping something sticks.
Email marketing should be about giving people content they need to positively interact with your brand company and its employees (yes, real people).
And, given that many people like me are on total email overwhelm, ensuring that your messages get read is going take much more effort and strategic thinking than developing some lukewarm content and hitting “send.”
What do you think? Do you agree that email is still a “killer app”? Do you have a case study or story you’d like to share about how you’ve used email marketing to connect with customers? If so, please leave a comment below or send me email at “info@dhcommunications.com” with “email marketing” in the subject line.
photo credit: www.istockphoto.com/Gewitterkind


November 16th, 2009 at 9:34 am
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Dianna Huff and Glenn Taylor, MLT Creative. MLT Creative said: RT @diannahuff: New post: B2B Email Marketing is So Not Dead. http://bit.ly/2ftSPp Quoted @ExactTarget and @WebsiteMagazine. #b2b [...]
November 16th, 2009 at 9:55 am
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by diannahuff: New post: B2B Email Marketing is So Not Dead. http://bit.ly/2ftSPp Quoted @ExactTarget and @WebsiteMagazine. #b2b #email #marketing…
November 16th, 2009 at 11:35 am
[...] reading here: Despite Social Media, B2B Email Marketing is Not Dead » B2B MarCom … Tags: all-things, delivers-news, dianna-huff This entry was posted on Monday, November 16th, [...]
November 16th, 2009 at 11:41 am
[...] Read the original post: Despite Social Media, B2B Email Marketing is Not Dead » B2B MarCom … [...]
November 17th, 2009 at 12:53 am
[...] Despite Social Media, B2B Email Marketing is Not Dead » B2B MarCom …14 hours ago by Dianna Huff Exact Target, in its new white paper, Is Email Marketing Endangered?, reports that according to Forrester Research, investments in email marketing will grow from $1.2 billion in 2009 to $2 billion billion by 2014. … – [...]
November 17th, 2009 at 6:20 am
Not only for B2B, the mail marketing will not dead , but even popular in future in many different fields.
November 19th, 2009 at 11:38 am
I’m editor and co-publisher of a regional magazine in Ontario and I have to get involved in selling ad space whether I like it or not. And because I’m a writer, I prefer to use email than make cold telephone calls. I use email to contact our ad prospects individually, addressing each person by name, and tailoring our message to each business if possible. It is incredibly time-consuming work, but it actually works to some degree. I am successful in gaining some advertisers this way, and I think the reason is that some people are like me and simply prefer the convenience of email to being on the phone. You can deal with email when YOU like, not when the caller catches you, and you both have a written record of what you discussed. Also, being able to include links to pages of interest seems to be effective in letting prospects get more information. I find that email works for me. This is balanced by my co-publisher and main ad salesperson, who prefers to make phone calls. While he makes more sales through the direct contact of the phone, I seem to catch those who prefer email. This combo seems to work for us.
November 20th, 2009 at 8:46 am
Gloria,
Thanks for your feedback. I agree with you. I receive lots of email from people I don’t know and it is easier to respond when I have the time versus being interrupted with a phone call while I’m writing (and if I don’t recognize the person / company / number calling, I generally do not pick up the phone).
December 10th, 2009 at 7:31 am
Yes, the mail marketing is not dead, and will last forever, unless the globalization stop.
December 14th, 2009 at 11:01 pm
Agreed…we keep hearing that the market is oversaturated, but the projected ROI for email marketing is expected to be over $43 for every dollar spent in 2010. SO, it’s still an incredibly effective strategy if done correctly.